Science Integration Institute logo
Archived E-mail Discussion List

 

Home

About Us

Resources

Bookstore

Education

Support SII

Research

Contact Us

Return to E-mail Discussion page

Previous in thread
Next in thread

> From: David Terrell <DTerrell@warnerpacific.edu>
> Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 11:56:26 -0800
> To: 'Todd Duncan' <duncan@scienceintegration.org>
> Subject: RE: quote of the week
>
> The problem I find is with the language we use to describe what we think is
> the theory that supports our model of the physical world. As when we use
> "units" to scale different values of the physical parameter being studied,
> there is no objectivity choosing the units, but it is an objective
> description of the phenomena when we say that one value is greater than the
> other. Take temperature as an example, is the temperature of the universe
> higher or lower than it was yesterday? (to mention some time in the past)
> Greeting to all,
> David Terrell Ph.D.
> Associate Professor of Physical Science
> Dept. Sciences and Mathematics
> Warner Pacific College
> (http://www.warnerpacific.edu)
> Phone: 503 517-1071
>
>> From: "Russell J. Hamilton" <rj-hamilton@uchicago.edu>
>> Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 08:39:00 -0600
>> To: Science Integration Institute <info@scienceintegration.org>
>> Subject: Re: quote of the week
>>
>> There was a time in my life that I would have agreed with this statement.
>> Now I would say that it is an assumption that an objective reality exists.
>> I do not believe that there is a separation between THE objective reality
>> and A physical therapy.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>>
>>
>> At 08:45 PM 11/25/2000 -0800, you wrote:
>>> "Any serious consideration of a physical theory must take into account
> the
>>> distinction between the objective reality, which is independent of any
>>> theory, and the physical concepts with which the theory operates. These
>>> concepts are intended to correspond with the objective reality, and by
> means
>>> of these concepts we picture this reality to ourselves."
>>>
>>> - Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (Physical Review, 47, 777, 1935)
>>>
>>> --
>>> *********************************
>>> * Science Integration Institute *
>>> * info@scienceintegration.org *
>>> * (503) 848-0280 *
>>> * www.scienceintegration.org *
>>> * 1971 SE 73rd Ave. *
>>> * Hillsboro, OR 97123 *
>>> *********************************
>>>
>> =======================================
>> - - - - - - Russell J. Hamilton, Ph.D. - - - - - -
>> - - - - - - The University of Chicago - - - - - -
>> - - - - - - Radiation & Cellular Oncology - - - - - -
>> - - - - - - phone: 312-996-3630 - - - - - -
>> - - - - - - fax: 312-413-3068 - - - - - -
>> - - - - - - e-mail: rj-hamilton@uchicago.edu - - - - - -
>> - - - - - - WWW: http://www.rado.uic.edu/~rjh - - - - - -
>>
> ========================================

Food for thought:

"Regardless of different personal views about science, no credible understanding of the natural world or our human existence…can ignore the basic insights of theories as key as evolution, relativity, and quantum mechanics." - The Dalai Lama
Send comments and suggestions to: © 1998-2009 Science Integration Institute
  info@scienceintegration.org Last Modified: August 3, 2006