|   Home About 
              Us Resources Bookstore Education Support 
              SII Research Contact 
              Us 
 | Return 
              to E-mail Discussion pageNext 
            in thread 
 Hi all,
 First, let me pass along a request: Since we don't all know each other, 
            please include a brief introduction in your first posting to the list. 
            That will help everyone know something about the perspective you bring 
            to the discussion. So... I'm Todd Duncan, and my "official" 
            fields of study are astrophysics and science education. I teach in 
            the Center for Science Education at Portland State University, in 
            Portland, Oregon. I'm also president of the Science Integration Institute, 
            which hosts this discussion list.
 I'd like to suggest that we get things started on the topic of "science 
            literacy." There's been much discussion in the science education 
            community during the past few years about the sorry state of science 
            literacy among the general public (or among the students in our classes). 
            I've noticed in discussions about this problem that there is no clear 
            agreement on what "science literacy" means, and no agreement 
            on why exactly it is important for most people in society to be "science-literate." 
            Some define science literacy in terms of specific facts and skills 
            from various disciplines of science (e.g. The "National Science 
            Education Standards" published by the National Research Council 
            in 1996). Others define it more generally, in terms of attitudes about 
            science or understanding of the basic goals, methods, and limitations 
            of science. (eg. Morris Shamos' "The Myth of Scientific Literacy," 
            or the "Science Cornerstone" program at Portland State).
 It's difficult to know how to move forward, without articulating clearly 
            *why* we want science literacy, and *how we would recognize it* if 
            we saw it. So, I'd like to throw out 2 questions, to see if we can 
            arrive at some kind of consensus:
 1) Why is it important for the "average person" to know 
            about science? (To be more specific, let's ask the question about 
            a typical college student who is not majoring in a science or engineering 
            field).
 2) What should they know? What knowledge, skills, or attitudes are
 necessary in order for someone to be classified as "science-literate?"
 Todd
 |