Home
About
Us
Resources
Bookstore
Education
Support
SII
Research
Contact
Us
|
Return
to Key Concepts in Science Page
Unknown Object Lab -
Teaching the Process of Science
Todd Duncan (duncant@pdx.edu)
Last modified 2/18/03
This lab provides a simple way to illustrate the key features of
the scientific process, suitable for almost any grade level. Its
also a good ice-breaker at the start of a class, to get students
working together.
Core components of the scientific method include making observations
about some part of the world in order to seek answers to questions,
formulating hypotheses or theories to explain these
observations, and performing experiments to generate additional
observations that help refine the theories and zero in on the best
answer to the questions. Scientific knowledge is always based on
such observations and experiments, and a theory can be disproved
by new knowledge but is never proven with absolute certainty
because we always observations of nature always have the final say.
In this lab, the question is very simple and well-defined: Whats
inside the box? Small groups of 3-6 students are provided with
sealed boxes containing various objects. Each member of the group
takes a turn at holding the box, shaking it, listening, etc. in
order to gain information about the object(s) inside, without
opening the box to see inside. A recordkeeper for each group records
observations made as the box is handed around, in a 2-column format:
1) Properties they think describe the object (metallic, plastic,
size, number of objects, etc. 2) Guesses - what is in the box? For
each guess, record next to it the confidence in the guess on a 1-10
scale (10 highest).
Also ask the groups to record notes on the following questions,
for later discussion:
1. What methods do you use to try to figure out what the unknown
object is?
2. How certain are you that you know what the object is? How does
this level of certainty change over the course of the exercise?
This activity is a model for how your beliefs about what's true
can change on the basis of evidence, so its useful to become
aware of this process of changing beliefs.
3. What is the most convincing evidence for you?
4. How do you convince someone else that your guess is correct?
Encourage the students to reach a consensus within their group about
the contents of the box . When they've reached a consensus or have
decided they can't reach one, ask them to write down their best
guess(es). After 5-10 minutes with one box, rotate boxes and repeat
this process until every group has had a chance to experiment with
all of the boxes.
Discussion
It is important to make the connection that this activity is a model
for all of science - everything we do in science has a parallel
in this activity, and anything we know about the world through science
is known through a process like this. Answers in nature are not
in the back of the book - we have no direct link to truth
but have only our observations to formulate the best answer we can.
This exercise gets at many of the things important in science: problem
solving, testing knowledge claims, and persuading others that your
theory is the best one given the observations so far. It also shows
how your beliefs can be changed by new information: try to use this
process as an analogy to how we learn and how science works in the
real world. We always have limited information, have to devise experiments
to figure out things without ever being able to open the box,
or look up the answers in the book. Every answer in
a science book was obtained by a process of investigation, of devising
clever ways to make nature reveal some of its secrets, which is
analogous to your struggles with the boxes (think about astronomy,
particle physics, etc. where it's very clear that we can't see inside
directly).
Notes on question 1 from past classes:
how well it fits inside box
weight
sound of hitting side of box
how much it can move in the box, how fast it moves when tilted
whether there is a difference in movement in different directions
(speed, amount, or sound)
process of elimination plays a big role here--point out that
they tend to guess familiar objects that most households have...relate
this to the fact that scientists pursue the most likely explanation
first
Question 2:
Did anyone have the experience of being absolutely certain they
knew what was in there, only to find that it was something different?
Did anyone think that figuring out the object was hopeless, but
then suddenly have a flash of inspiration? If you were certain,
did you have trouble convincing others in your group that you were
right? Statements of others in the group affect your own beliefs.
(For example, if one person comes up with a good theory and is confident
of it, others find it difficult to generate alternative theories,
unless a clear piece of evidence is noticed that contradicts the
original theory).
Questions 3 & 4:
most convincing when you test the idea yourself (as opposed
to just hearing someone tell you what is inside)
majority rule tends to play a role
the more unique the sound (the more common possibilities
can be eliminated by the sound), the more certain you are of a guess
(for example, a soda can has a very distinctive sound)
|