Archived
E-mail Discussion List
|
|
Return to E-mail Discussion page Previous in threadNext in thread Hi David & Maya, David, thanks for your response and so if the problem is a 'reference frame', are you suggesting that the solution is that we would need to conform to an established reference frame, or are you suggesting that we need to create a new reference frame that conforms to our new reality? It seems to me that the latter might be worth exploring, and would be super cool. Since the framers of QT developed the theory within their accepted paradigm, and we have since made some remarkable progress since then, and our paradigmatic constraints are more open and with additional perspectives available to us, I would like to ask you if you could at least consider a feasibility construct that might meet with these proposed new criteria? If it appears to be feasible, might you perhaps suggest a reference frame that would work? I look forward to us solving the TOE within the next couple of weeks! Well thanks for considering these suggestions, and BTW, if it is obviously unworkable, it would be nice to hear how you arrive at that position, too. Thanks again, Best regards, Sid _________________ "To know even one atom fully would imply knowledge of its relations to all other phenomena in the infinite universe." - The Dalai Lama |
