Previous 
              in thread
              Next in thread 
             Just to start with something 
              relatively simple, how about an emotion like anger? I think it makes 
              sense that since our distant ancestors were probably confronted 
              with frequent direct threats to their survival, those who were inclined 
              to focus all their energy and attention on lashing out at a threat 
              (e.g. a predator) were more likely to survive and propogate this 
              tendency toward anger. Of course, this may not be such a good thing 
              anymore, since many threats we face in modern society are not best 
              solved by an immediate lashing out. But along the lines of what 
              Craig is suggesting, it seems that we can see how anger might have 
              developed.
            Todd
            > From: Craig Tyler 
              <tyler@mafalda.uchicago.edu>
              > Organization: University of Chicago, Department of Astronomy 
              and Astrophysics
              > Reply-To: tyler@oddjob.uchicago.edu
              > Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:49:20 -0600
              > To: science@lists.pdx.edu
              > Subject: origins
              > 
              > All
              > 
              > At the end of the SII origins workshop this past saturday, 
              we departed
              > with a question still hanging. We were talking about Darwinian 
              natural
              > selection, and in particular how it could change the behavior 
              or
              > personality of a species. For example, imagine two clans of 
              early
              > homonids (which might evolve into modern humans). If one clan 
              were more
              > violent and the other more peaceful, perhaps the more violent 
              clan would
              > fight with each other or with other clans, and many of them 
              would die
              > before they had a chance to pass their violent genes along. 
              the
              > peaceful clan would reproduce more, by that logic, and subsequent
              > generations would be predominantly peaceful. (This type of 
              behavioral
              > genetics has been documented in other species.)
              > 
              > Along those lines, do you think it is possible to identify 
              hypothetical
              > evolutionary origins for modern human behavior? for your own 
              behavior
              > or that of people you know? in particular, I had some categories 
              in
              > mind:
              > 
              > 1. laws and morals. for example, should evolution tend to weed 
              out
              > terrorists from the human population?
              > 2. emotions. for example, is there a survival advantage for 
              those who
              > care about others? (could emotions be merely chemical in nature?
              > consider prozac!)
              > 3. sense of purpose. for example, the work week is 40+ hours, 
              but we
              > could feed and clothe everyone with much less work than that. 
              where
              > does our work ethic come from?
              > 
              > Any ideas about any part of this question?
              > CT