Archived
E-mail Discussion List
|
|
Return to E-mail Discussion page Re:>> TD: Finally, science can change the way we perceive the world.>EW: Seems like we ought to have multidisciplinary courses in science and philosophy. Or should this be a more integral part of science courses? Or are you suggesting that science courses, even as they are, can change the way non-scientists perceive the world? In short: The history and philosophy of science (e.g. we discuss a bit about Galileo, Descartes, Lavosier, Watson and Crick) is already taught in many courses, even in high school, but there is not much emphasis place on it. I think we would benefit by doubling the time we spend on including such "philosophical" content into our science courses. This must be more than an introductory chapter at the first of the semester (the model I have experienced). Additionally, I will answer for TD: YES, science courses as they are CAN and DO change the way non-scientists perceive the world, but MANY MORE could be impressed/transformed if the structure of those courses were changed. I've talked quite a bit with Todd about such things and am convinced that he has developed and excellent model for making those structural changes in the university curriculum. Dr. Brian McSpadden Gardener USDA-ARS Root Disease and Biological Control Unit Washington State University Pullman, WA 99164 (509) 335 1116 (509) 335 7674 FAX |
