|   Home About 
              Us Resources Bookstore Education Support 
              SII Research Contact 
              Us 
 | Return 
              to E-mail Discussion pagePrevious 
            in thread Next in thread
 
 Hi, Murali. Thanks for your posting. 
              I wanted to add some comments on a couple of points that are related 
              to some of the things that were discussed in the SII course on technology 
              that just ended: "...This same principle is what makes me not 
              worry about the theory behind microwave ovens. As long as a 'system' 
              satisfies a person's utilitarian ends he will most probably not 
              invest energy in trying to figure out its parts. The abstractions 
              that he deals with is all that is needed. The problem with this 
              situation is that unlike olden times, science has advanced really 
              deeply in to many fields and the inevitable 'pockets of knowledge' 
              have created enormous chasms between 'system creators' and 'system 
              users' in terms of knowing how stuff works. In a lot of cases it 
              is virtually impossible to 'know' how stuff works because it might 
              need years of study." Clearly, one can benefit greatly from 
              technology without having a clue as to what's behind it. However, 
              if you do know what's behind it or if you are at least willing to 
              think about what might be behind it, technology can be used as a 
              tool to increase our sense of connection to the universe that science 
              has uncovered. One of the activities we went through in the technology 
              class involved looking at a piece of technology and tracing its 
              history back to its raw materials and beyond, to the creation of 
              the raw materials themselves. In another activity, we brainstormed 
              about all the processes and principles of nature that a product 
              of technology reminded us of. We talked about the needs or desires 
              that different technologies address and about what it says about 
              our universe that those needs and desires exist and can be at least 
              partially satisfied by tools that we create. Technology can be a 
              valuable tool in science integration, if we encourage people to 
              think about what's behind it. Most people's most direct interaction 
              with the results of science is through technology. Although people 
              may find science abstract and detached from their lives, few people 
              in our society would say that about technology. The high tech tools 
              that we use in daily life demonstrate that science describes the 
              real world we live in and can remind us of the scientific principles 
              upon which they are based. We don't need to see technology from 
              this point of view every time we use it and, as you said, we can't 
              expect anyone to know how everything works, but just asking the 
              questions about what's behind technology ("Where does this 
              tool ultimately come from?" "How might it work and be 
              related to other things I've observed in nature?") and making 
              an attempt at the answers, with whatever background we have, may 
              help us feel connected to nature and to "appreciate the oneness 
              of the universe." Amanda  |