Science Integration Institute logo
Archived E-mail Discussion List

 

Home

About Us

Resources

Bookstore

Education

Support SII

Research

Contact Us

Return to E-mail Discussion page

Previous in thread
Next in thread

Hi all,

Some of you might be interested in a book by Lewis Wolpert, The Unnatural Nature of Science, which expands on this point Eric described.

Something else to ponder is *why* our mental processes and the way nature works are such that the scientific method is such a struggle for us. I mean, since we are made of stuff that is operating according to principles we discover through science, why aren't we just directly tuned into those principles? Why do most of our ideas turn out to be wrong, so that we need the scientific method to zero in on the principles that work in describing what happens in nature?

Todd

Food for thought:

"Regardless of different personal views about science, no credible understanding of the natural world or our human existence…can ignore the basic insights of theories as key as evolution, relativity, and quantum mechanics." - The Dalai Lama
Send comments and suggestions to: © 1998-2009 Science Integration Institute
  info@scienceintegration.org Last Modified: August 3, 2006