Education
| Current Lecture Series | Previous
Lectures & Classes | Calendar Intro: Welcome
and intro to course: In this class, we will define science integration
and discuss tips for applying it to our lives. The course is designed
to set the context for and to motivate our other courses.
SLIDE 1 (pdf
file of slides - 36K)
Working Definitions
A worldview answers
questions about what the world contains, what's important, how you
relate to the world, what you can control, etc. It's your personal
philosophy.
Activity:
1. Without thinking
about it too much, write down 3 things you did last week.
2. Why did you
do these things?
3. What were
you thinking about while you did them?
For example:
brush teeth to preserve teeth, thinking about the day ahead/behind
while you do this. Read paper to stay aware of the world, thinking
about when the recycling truck is coming.
Some Observations About
Worldviews
We all have a
worldview, even if it's not very well thought out or has been borrowed
from our parents, our society, or some other influence.
SLIDE 2
Types of Worldviews
Abstract worldview
is intellectual, detached. We think that the world works or is arranged
a certain way, but we don't see how that relates to us. It's a map
of the world without a "you-are-here" marker.
A personal worldview
describes how you and your actions relate to the world. It includes
your choices, your experiences, your day-to-day concerns. A reflective
worldview captures what you think about yourself and your role during
your more reflective moments. An instantaneous worldview is what
you're thinking at a particular moment. It can change dramatically
from one moment to the next and depends heavily on external conditions.
(For example, being hungry or stubbing your toe can completely change
your instantaneous worldview.)
Example: technology
is good vs. it matters to the universe that I design SRAMs at Intel
vs. what gets me out of bed in the morning
Worldviews can
be inconsistent, and we can hold multiple worldviews at the same
time.
(For a given
person, these 3 types of worldviews may or may not reflect each
other. Many of our greatest regrets come from inconsistencies among
the 3 types of worldviews. If our abstract worldview is correct
but we don't correctly translate that into our personal worldview,
we may discover that we've taken actions that actually oppose what
we were trying to do. In our more reflective moments, we may be
sad to realize that we're not living our day-to-day life according
to our personal, reflective worldview. That observation indicates
that our instantaneous worldview isn't consistent with our reflective
one. We do everything for a reason, but we may not agree with that
reason in hindsight.)
Today we're here
to talk about integrating an abstract worldview, revealed by science,
into our personal and instantaneous worldviews.
"Why integrate
science into our worldviews?"
Science has uncovered
all sorts of information about ourselves, our origins, and our relationships
to other things in the universe. It describes the stage on which
we live out our lives.
Is it absolutely
necessary to have this context? No...most people live their lives
with very little awareness of this context. However, the more context
you have, the more likely it is that you will end up doing what
you really want to do and the more meaningful your actions will
feel (provided that you map the big context to something in your
daily life).
Example:
judge goals of
company with society in mind
judge goals of
society with global community in mind
etc.
Science arose
from the need to distinguish what works from what doesn't. Early
man created a context by making up stories and traditions. Science
was too poorly developed to help with that. However, they also needed
to stay warm, have enough to eat, protect themselves, etc. Stories
not necessarily aligned with nature. Once you have a goal, how you
can achieve it depends on properties of the universe that science
describes.
don't do a rain
dance--develop an irrigation system.
don't cure a
disease by bleeding someone--cure them by giving a certain kind
of medicine.
recycling example:
How many of you
recycle?
Why do you do
it? (discuss how science has made us aware of Earth as an ecosystem,
finiteness of resources, time scale for things to be recycled by
natural processes)
Is recycling
always a good thing to do? (discuss how science can help us predict
the consequences of curbside pickup, building recycling plants,
processing needed to recycle)
Integrating Science
into Your Reflective Worldview
Won't have time
to go into the following activities as deeply as you might like,
but the goal is to demonstrate how they work, get over the activation
energy of trying them, and get some feedback on your initial ideas.
There are 2 general
ways to integrate science into your reflective worldview. One is
to look at what science has to say about the world and to think
about what that might mean. Can also build up scenarios based on
what we've already observed. Many of our SII courses focus on areas
and topics in science that we think have the greatest potential
to affect your personal philosophy. For example,we think everyone
should be interested in cosmology because it describes the overall
"stage" on which we live out our lives. Knowledge of quantum physics
and relativity can change your ideas about reality, space, and time.
But the scientific
description of the world is probably not complete and you want to
make sure that your reflective worldview is personal to you, so
another approach is to start with what you already believe about
what the universe contains, what's important, etc. and to think
about what science might have to say about those beliefs.
Do you have any
beliefs that are inconsistent with information revealed by science?
Where do you think those beliefs come from? What is the essence
behind the belief that you're reluctant to give up? Is the essence
of the belief really inconsistent with science or just the details?
For instance, at one point, many people believed that it was essential
that the sun revolve around the Earth for us to feel important or
significant. Now, most people fully accept and aren't bothered by
the fact that the Earth revolves around the sun.
What (if any)
scientific grounding is there for your beliefs? What scenarios about
what's going on in the universe would be consistent with your beliefs?
What other properties might you expect to see if your beliefs were
true?
What evidence
(if any) would cause you to change your beliefs? If you're truly
open-minded, you should be willing to change almost all of your
beliefs, given sufficient evidence (even though finding that evidence
may be highly unlikely). You may have a few core beliefs that you
are unwilling to give up. (For example, for me, the belief that
our lives can be meaningful is a core belief.) To help distinguish
core beliefs from other deeply held beliefs, think about what you'd
do if you knew for sure that the universe was the opposite from
what you now believe. Would you reformulate your thinking and behavior;
would you kill yourself because life was no longer worth living;
would you act in opposition, fight back? Core beliefs act as a strong
guide, for better or for worse.
Example: human
life is sacred...implies that doing animal research to prolong or
improve human life is probably OK. But what if we encountered another
life form that was significantly more developed than us. Imagine
that they were to us what we are to monkeys. Would it be OK for
them to do research on us to prolong or improve their lives? What
is the core belief here?
SLIDE 3
Integrating Science
into Your Reflective Worldview
Brainstorm alternative
scenarios. Don't be too timid--some scenario is right.
The Importance of Our
Everyday, Instantaneous Worldview
Our instantaneous
worldview is ultimately what drives are lives. The most heroic accomplishment
we can imagine is achieved by making individual choices, day by
day.
SLIDE 4
Our instantaneous
worldview is influenced by conditions (hunger, being hot or cold)
and distractions and pressures from others.
SLIDE 5
Force consistency
between your instantaneous worldview and actions. Decide and commit.
Just being aware
of the world around you can help you feel more connected to the
big picture. The world is more than a set of props around which
we live out the drama of our lives. Other people are more than actors
in our life story. Science is available to everyone. You can make
your own observations about how the world works and think about
what that means to you. Pick something and ask yourself why it's
there, how it got there, etc.
Use reminders:
Each morning, ask yourself what you're planning to do with the day.
Try to answer the question with as broad a context as possible.
Do the same thing throughout the day, stop yourself to ask what
you're doing right then, connecting it to the bigger picture. Set
an alarm if you need to.
When you are
stopped at a red light, use the opportunity to observe the world
around you. Use technology to remind yourself of the scientific
principles behind it.
Guiding principle:
Probably impossible for us to keep the big picture in mind all the
time. What we need at our fingertips is something to help us make
choices that are consistent with our reflective worldview. That
way we'll do the "right" things, and even though we may not see
exactly how what we're doing matters, we can still be motivated
and confident with the knowledge that it does matter. We can try
to live in a way that is consistent with any purpose we'd imagine.
Example guiding
principles. Note that it doesn't have to summarize our worldview,
just be consistent with it. It's best if the guiding principle has
some feedback mechanism.
SLIDE 6
The web is your
personal worldview. Your sense of meaning depends on what you are
connected to. Most of the time, our worldview is pretty small, but
with a conscious effort and some practice, we can spend more of
our lives with a larger web, connected to the cosmos.
Additional Topics &
Activities
Different ways of "knowing"
Describe this room (point out the different levels of description)
"Life is the art of drawing sufficient conclusions from insufficient
premises." - Samuel Butler
|